#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
I think you fold here. Regardless of who wins the all-in you are pretty much assuring yourself at least 2nd, with a reasonable chance to push for first (chip count will be 2-1, hardly a terrible prospect). I think this is one of the rare times to just fold your way into a better position
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
Ok let get over with this thread.
NOT EVEN STANZEE IS FOLDING HERE, OK???? NEVER EVER FOLD AK ITM ON A PARTY SNG OMFG , 20% YOUR STACK IS ALREADY ON THE POT...OMG!!! JUST CALL!!!!!!!!.} Thanks, I apologize all the shouting. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
[ QUOTE ]
Ok let get over with this thread. NOT EVEN STANZEE IS FOLDING HERE, OK???? NEVER EVER FOLD AK ITM ON A PARTY SNG OMFG , 20% YOUR STACK IS ALREADY ON THE POT...OMG!!! JUST CALL!!!!!!!!.} Thanks, I apologize all the shouting. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, what he said/yelled. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
interesting.
i like noah's post best, i think if i was the smallest stack there i would have folded. However i called player 1 showed At player 2 99 a T hit on the turn and i came in second. with blinds that big im not sure how much of an edge i would have had heads up, if im even the best player there. But i agree it is a close one. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
Thats what makes this an easy call. If the folders think they can outplay their opponents with these blinds, I think they are sadly mistaken. They are the ones being outplayed by folding too much.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
<<<<<< hitting head on computer, youre conclusion is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooo wrong. Look ,do whatever you want.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
what part/parts of the conclusion were wrong valuenzuela???
i see that this is an easy call for you, as you believe their ranges to be very loose, is that correct? by the way this was not a party sit n go it was on ladbrokes. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
[ QUOTE ]
what part/parts of the conclusion were wrong valuenzuela??? i see that this is an easy call for you, as you believe their ranges to be very loose, is that correct? by the way this was not a party sit n go it was on ladbrokes. [/ QUOTE ] Ill imagine each time we call we win 33% of the time, which is an understatement( i think more like 40%)..ok now look at the pot odds....yeah thats right. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
i'm not sure you should always use pot odds as gospel.
if say our stack was 400 less then, lets say 40% of the time we do win the 3 way all-in (0.4 x 500) + (0.6 x 200) = 200 + 120 = 320 but if we fold then we get (0.25 x 500) + (0.75 x 300) = 125 + 225 = 350 so surely if we were the shortest stack it would be correct to fold, no? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aks 3 handed 2 all-ins, hero\'s action???
Here is my math:
Blinds are 400/800 Stacks are: 5800 5000 4200 So if we fold we have -800. If we call we win 33% of the time we have 0. two things: ure winning more than 33% of the time. playing for second on a sng is not worth it unless u have a microscopic stack( its impossible to fold AKs profitably which such high blinds) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|