#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP BBJ Qualification? - Expanding on Tapin
[ QUOTE ]
Well, since it's advantageous for Party to make you use the community card I would say they would make you use the community card. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure it's (necessarily directly) "advantageous" for Party, given that either they take 10% now or they take 10% a little later. Seems value-neutral to me. They're taking $0.05 per hand no matter what. Of course, if you wanted to argue that the advertising value of a large jackpot was non-trivial, I could understand that I guess. As for the initial question -- once this topic showed up, I dug into my email to find the Party response. I keep most of my emails with poker sites, just in case something (in my imagination, more serious than this) comes up. And I can't find the one answering this question -- I found one answering a different bad beat jackpot question, but not this one. Which leads me to believe either I imagined the whole thing, or I asked a different site (um, Cryptos? Beats me). So I don't have any reason to advocate that Party would go with the "screw the player who just thought he hit a jackpot" ruling. Other than my (remaining) gut feeling [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|