#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
Come on little girls!
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
C'mon guys. One more warm body.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
monix:
please show. Thanks. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
So really pushing those quad 4's was the way to go, huh?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
Yeah. You could have gotten at least another SB out of villain by fastplaying, or raising sooner, typically. He won't put you on quads.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
2+2 tables are known for going nuts with marginal holdings, trying to exploit small edges. Therefore it only makes sense to push your monsters hard.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
Is slow777 a lurker? He's not very good, and he's not very polite.
Edit: But he is a lucksack. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
[ QUOTE ]
Is slow777 a lurker? He's not very good, and he's not very polite. Edit: But he is a lucksack. [/ QUOTE ] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
Alright. It's settled then. We take his money. Unless he keeps sucking out.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 table?
Agreed!
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|