|
View Poll Results: BB is 44/10/2 | |||
A2o | 58 | 16.48% | |
22 | 48 | 13.64% | |
Q8o | 49 | 13.92% | |
K5s | 55 | 15.63% | |
57s | 19 | 5.40% | |
67s | 33 | 9.38% | |
K5o | 32 | 9.09% | |
i voted | 58 | 16.48% | |
Voters: 352. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aggression... Is It Vital?
Sure its possible, but winning 10k in a year isn't nearly as much as you would have won if you had been raising and being more aggresive.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aggression... Is It Vital?
[ QUOTE ]
I was playing 5/10 SH last year. I had never read any poker book. I didn't even know what 2+2 WAS. Basically, my game plan was to limp any A, or any 2 paint cards, and bet/call any time I flopped TP, and fold if I didnt flop a pair or 4flush/open ended. I ONLY raised AJ+, 99 + & KQ, and I didnt care at all what position I was in. I only very rarely bluffed. I sometimes semibluffed. But I typically didnt even raise hands like TPGK in position, Id just call down. I did try to find relatively passive tables to play at. I made almost 1,000 BB last year as this player. You tell me, is it possible to win playing passively? jvs [/ QUOTE ] fcking troll |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aggression... Is It Vital?
[ QUOTE ]
I was playing 5/10 SH last year. I had never read any poker book. I didn't even know what 2+2 WAS. Basically, my game plan was to limp any A, or any 2 paint cards, and bet/call any time I flopped TP, and fold if I didnt flop a pair or 4flush/open ended. I ONLY raised AJ+, 99 + & KQ, and I didnt care at all what position I was in. I only very rarely bluffed. I sometimes semibluffed. But I typically didnt even raise hands like TPGK in position, Id just call down. I did try to find relatively passive tables to play at. I made almost 1,000 BB last year as this player. You tell me, is it possible to win playing passively? jvs [/ QUOTE ] You replied in the wrong post - sfer's post on variance is here. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|