![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Swedish Elite League hockey is played on a bigger rink, teams run different systems and overall different game.
As I said, overall with all the rule changes (this includes the officials actually getting stricter and calling more obstruction/interference penalties) these rules on the goalies are not needed |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. Goalies will always be untouchable. Either through the rulebook or teammate enforcement. Under the old rules, a netminder was fair game if handling the puck outside the crease. But touch him, and pay the price.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
No. Goalies will always be untouchable. Either through the rulebook or teammate enforcement. Under the old rules, a netminder was fair game if handling the puck outside the crease. But touch him, and pay the price. [/ QUOTE ] I am entirely in favor of goalies being untouchable, but only by teammate enforcement and not by rules. I am in favor of teammate enforcement for many things. The NHL brass needs to quit being such little bitches about fights and goons. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No. Goalies will always be untouchable. Either through the rulebook or teammate enforcement. Under the old rules, a netminder was fair game if handling the puck outside the crease. But touch him, and pay the price. [/ QUOTE ] I am entirely in favor of goalies being untouchable, but only by teammate enforcement and not by rules. I am in favor of teammate enforcement for many things. The NHL brass needs to quit being such little bitches about fights and goons. [/ QUOTE ] Bertuzzi isn't really helping that one much |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] No. Goalies will always be untouchable. Either through the rulebook or teammate enforcement. Under the old rules, a netminder was fair game if handling the puck outside the crease. But touch him, and pay the price. [/ QUOTE ] I am entirely in favor of goalies being untouchable, but only by teammate enforcement and not by rules. I am in favor of teammate enforcement for many things. The NHL brass needs to quit being such little bitches about fights and goons. [/ QUOTE ] Bertuzzi isn't really helping that one much [/ QUOTE ] Right. There is definitely a line, however, between goonery and teammate enforcement and outright criminal behavior. I'm all for a fair fight and a good solid hit. What Bertuzzi did was just plain criminal. He should be in jail for a long time for what he did. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Other teams such as Ottawa, The Wild, Calgary, some others have at times run trapping similar systems since. [/ QUOTE ] "Since", I'll give you. But the current Flames don't play the trap. Sutter's system is an aggressive forecheck. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Other teams such as Ottawa, The Wild, Calgary, some others have at times run trapping similar systems since. [/ QUOTE ] "Since", I'll give you. But the current Flames don't play the trap. Sutter's system is an aggressive forecheck. [/ QUOTE ] true. With that they run a tight back-checking style in the nuetral zone if the opposite team breaks the forecheck moving out of the offensive zone into the nuetral zone. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm pumped for the no obstruction rules. It'll just make it that much easier for our forecheckers to get to the puck carrier without being held up.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lets be honest with ourselves. Calgary was nothing more than lucky with an extremely hot goaltender. They overachieved and are not a top 10 team in the NHL. rJ |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The one new rule that I know right away that I will not like is limiting the room a goalie can stick handle the puck. This new rule is a joke... goalies have become much better over the past five years or so at stick handling and now the league is taken that away. [/ QUOTE ] The AHL had the same rule this season with the trapezod area behind the net and it did not affect the game at all. Granted Broduer & DiPietro are better puck handlers than guys like Kari Lehtonin, Niittymaki & Craig Anderson, but I think this rule change is very minor. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|