Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:31 AM
pryor15 pryor15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: possum lodge
Posts: 624
Default the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

villain is about 62/10/1 over 30 hands for the session i played w/ him, but this is pretty early in it, so i have no real reads, just a sense he's kinda loose.

i also got called a fish by the table coach after this hand, which did great things for me on my other table with him.

PokerRoom 2/4 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: pryor15 is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] , 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] .
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, UTG+2 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB completes, pryor15 checks.

Flop: (4 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
pryor15 checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, UTG+2 folds, MP3 folds, SB folds, pryor15 calls.

Turn: (2.50 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">pryor15 bets</font>, UTG+1 calls.

River: (4.50 BB) 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">pryor15 bets</font>, UTG+1 calls.

Final Pot: 6.50 BB

in retrospect, i'm thinking i should give up on the river and just try to see the showdown for free. i don't know that he calls the turn with a hand i can beat when my straight hits. but he might, right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:35 AM
arsixsixwy arsixsixwy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 111
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

To address the subject of the post, the Clarkmeister theorem dictates betting when the fourth flush card comes on the river, not on the turn. I'll reply to the hand itself shortly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:35 AM
pryor15 pryor15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: possum lodge
Posts: 624
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
To address the subject of the post, the Clarkmeister theorem dictates betting when the fourth flush card comes on the river, not on the turn. I'll reply to the hand itself shortly.

[/ QUOTE ]

my bad. i must have missed that somehow.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:37 AM
mmmmmbrother mmmmmbrother is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 2/4? maybe next week
Posts: 383
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

i can see him calling with two pair. but what is he betting on the flop that you should stay in for 5:1 pot odds. i think your oesd outs are partly discounted for sure.


i thought clark was just when the 4th suit hit on the river
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:38 AM
eviljeff eviljeff is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 37
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

I think c/f is the best line for flop and turn. c/c seems better than b/f (or b/c) for the river, especially since 2/4 players can be trickier, in my experience.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:40 AM
pryor15 pryor15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: possum lodge
Posts: 624
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
i can see him calling with two pair. but what is he betting on the flop that you should stay in for 5:1 pot odds. i think your oesd outs are partly discounted for sure.


[/ QUOTE ]

JTo? 2 pair?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:41 AM
Claunchy Claunchy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 283
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

Yeah, this isn't Clarkmeister, but I like it fine. I see no reason whatsoever to give a loose villain like that credit for the flush, and if you check to him on the turn he will undoubtedly bet, with or without it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:41 AM
arsixsixwy arsixsixwy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 111
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

Preflop: I guess you can see a free flop. If they force you to.

Flop: I hate this call. This pot is superdupersmall, you have eight outs to a straight, but really only six to a straight you feel good about, and since you may be drawing dead already, I might even discount it to more like 5 outs. Fold this. Now.

Turn: Accidental misapplication of Clarkmeister theorem. Okay. To an offsuit blank, you're check/folding, right?

River: Well, you made your hand. Too bad it's beaten by a heart. Any heart in the world. Villain would be pretty dumb to be calling you down without one, so howsabout we try for a free showdown? You're not getting called by anything you beat.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-26-2005, 12:45 AM
arsixsixwy arsixsixwy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 111
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, this isn't Clarkmeister, but I like it fine. I see no reason whatsoever to give a loose villain like that credit for the flush, and if you check to him on the turn he will undoubtedly bet, with or without it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you taken a look at the pot size?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-26-2005, 04:01 AM
Nfinity Nfinity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 118
Default Re: the wrong way to use Clarkmeister\'s theorem?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, this isn't Clarkmeister, but I like it fine. I see no reason whatsoever to give a loose villain like that credit for the flush, and if you check to him on the turn he will undoubtedly bet, with or without it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you taken a look at the pot size?

[/ QUOTE ]

So your suggesting Chck-Folding the Turn right?

Yeah, I wouldn't like a Check/ Call there if it wasn't 4 to a flush, so I don' like betting out even more.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.