|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Petition to Remove <50bb Buyins From Party Skins (xposted)
Sorry but that's not a good enough argument. Say Mahatma sits down on your left. That probably drops your EV too so should he be banned because he's a better player?
Yes a short stack alters the correct play just like a hyper aggro player screws with the table dynamic too but pushing you out of your comfort zone there isn't a good reason why they shouldn't be able do this. Are you advocating that when someone loses their way down to under 50bb they should be kicked? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Petition to Remove <50bb Buyins From Party Skins (xposted)
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry but that's not a good enough argument. Say Mahatma sits down on your left. That probably drops your EV too so should he be banned because he's a better player? Yes a short stack alters the correct play just like a hyper aggro player screws with the table dynamic too but other than pushing you out of your comfort zone there isn't a good reason why they shouldn't be able do this. Are you advocating that when someone loses their way down to under 50bb they should be kicked? [/ QUOTE ] There's a huge difference between the analogy you made and my argument. Mahatma is a more experienced player who is obviously better than me. he wins because he is better at playing poker than i am. these players lose less because they have read a book which, admittedly, exploits a mistake online sites made when setting up their games. As for kicking someone, that's silly. there is a reason B&M poker rooms allow you to buyin full and then do short buys should you desire. you should be allowed one short buy and that's it. another argument is that some fish are playing way way above their BR's here. a lot of players are buying in for 20 on a 200 BR at a NL 100 game because they can't stand the "bad players" at 25NL. it gives them tons of variance, but ultimately their money would last longer and get raked more at 25. fim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Petition to Remove <50bb Buyins From Party Skins (xposted)
Fair enough, if you want to discuss it on a serious level as a distortion of the game then ok, but the fact it negatively impacts your EV shouldn't be relevant when considering whether it should be treated as legal or not, fairness to all players should be the standard for that.
I fail to see how less of their $ going to rake is a negative, the more of it that goes to PP, the less there is for all the players, those bottom feeders at 25nl wind up sending an awful lot of money up the poker food chain but once it goes to PP in rake it's gone for good. I haven't been on the PP 10/20 tables for a month or so, how widespread is this becoming? I read somewhere there was a book that advocated this strategy but as little as a month or two ago there were 3 or 4 fish short buying for every 'squirrel' playing tight short stack pair poker. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Petition to Remove <50bb Buyins From Party Skins (xposted)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sorry but that's not a good enough argument. Say Mahatma sits down on your left. That probably drops your EV too so should he be banned because he's a better player? Yes a short stack alters the correct play just like a hyper aggro player screws with the table dynamic too but other than pushing you out of your comfort zone there isn't a good reason why they shouldn't be able do this. Are you advocating that when someone loses their way down to under 50bb they should be kicked? [/ QUOTE ] There's a huge difference between the analogy you made and my argument. Mahatma is a more experienced player who is obviously better than me. he wins because he is better at playing poker than i am. these players lose less because they have read a book which, admittedly, exploits a mistake online sites made when setting up their games. As for kicking someone, that's silly. there is a reason B&M poker rooms allow you to buyin full and then do short buys should you desire. you should be allowed one short buy and that's it. another argument is that some fish are playing way way above their BR's here. a lot of players are buying in for 20 on a 200 BR at a NL 100 game because they can't stand the "bad players" at 25NL. it gives them tons of variance, but ultimately their money would last longer and get raked more at 25. fim [/ QUOTE ] What is the minimum buy in at limit tables? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|