#1
|
|||
|
|||
10+1: I probably should have folded this ITM
Blinds 150/300, stacks after posting:
Hero: t2670 SB: t2630 BB: r2250 SB has been folding a lot, will probably only call with a strong ace, KJ+, or a pair. BB is looser, but his range only differs in that he'll call with any ace. Hero: 67o, pushes on a blind steal. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10+1: I probably should have folded this ITM
If you have their ranges right then this is meerly a math problem. Eastbays tool says it's a fold (-.4% of PP, with AT+ defining good ace)
Another thing to consider if SB is a lot tighter than BB, it would be better to fold marginally profitable hands here to retain a good image and then push any two from the SB every orbit. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10+1: I probably should have folded this ITM
[ QUOTE ]
If you have their ranges right then this is meerly a math problem. [/ QUOTE ] I would say the given range (pretty standard) is close enough to correct that +/- a few hands wouldn't make a large % difference. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10+1: I probably should have folded this ITM
Yes, very likely you are right. Plus like I said in my second point even if their calling ranges would be slightly off shifting this to a push (which I don't think it would) I'd still fold as you have a much better opportunity when you are in SB.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10+1: I probably should have folded this ITM
[ QUOTE ]
SB has been folding a lot, will probably only call with a strong ace, KJ+, or a pair. BB is looser, but his range only differs in that he'll call with any ace. [/ QUOTE ] I would bet that their calling ranges (especially the BB after SB folds) are a lot looser than that given that it is down to 3 and that would make it even more -EV... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|