![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Are you talking about the 6-max or full games? The 6-maxers are goons but the full ringers were nits. There were some clear morons sprinkled in, but most of them were pretty weak-tight. [/ QUOTE ] I'm no good at reads -- I couldn't figure out if this guy was a goon, a nit, or a moron. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Thanks for all the feedback, much appreciated. I only limp 77, which is clearly a bit weak; I'll start mixing it up a bit. But limping and playing for the set works pretty well for me. Given the hand to play again I would have raised the turn, probably to $8-10, to probe for the flush, and folded to a strong raise. I'm still comfortable with the laydown. I'm sure I'm probably good a fair percentage of the time, and I can imagine occasionally calling this. But way too often these players just bet what they have, and if they have the nuts the just push it all in. Without a read, I just decided to dump it and watch this guy some more. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
with CO still to act behind me on the turn, I call the turn just like you did.
after co folded, I might call the push on the river as most guys check when they hit the flush on the turn. I don't want to raise the turn as it would be a significant amount and I'm charging myself extra to boat on the river. whether I call or fold river is heavily read dependent. The more solid the player, the more I lean towards fold. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|