|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Bet vs Party poker 50NL winrates
Just keep in mind that you should expect significantly greater variance at PartyPoker than at UltimateBet. While the site is a lot fishier, this means that you will suffer some awful beats as well - caused by players inappropriately making calls and getting lucky. However, them paying you off inappropriately also yields greater rewards in the long run.
Best of luck! The Greedy Gecko PokerGreed Blog |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Bet vs Party poker 50NL winrates
My current DB (since beginning March) ($50 and $100 NL)
shows Party averaging 12.37PTBB/100 and UB 11.53PTBB/100 Not much difference (and in fact my last DB would show a slightly better win rate at UB - I started the new one when Party doubled the stacks) Of course the Party skin bonuses mean that the hourly rate is significantly better at Party. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Bet vs Party poker 50NL winrates
Excession,
Would you be interested in posting a graph of your results? I'm very interested in what the graph of an optimally winning player looks like, for something to measure against. (i.e. how much short term variance, bad runs, general winning slope). My normal slope at $100NL is 12PTBB/100 but I have periods of bad beats and bad play that cut that rate down significantly. Thanks in advance and if you don't have a grapher/time etc that's cool too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Bet vs Party poker 50NL winrates
is this for ring games? or 6max?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ultimate Bet vs Party poker 50NL winrates
Wow those ptbb/100 are really impressive, are those 6 max or full ring?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|