#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
... for limit 2/4 to 5/10?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
I'm pretty sure Pacific is softer, but the software is just so terrible that the slightly worse games at PP make it worth playing at PP instead.
-Craig |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
pacific is pretty soft but you can only play one table at once.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
pacific is pretty soft but you can only play half of a table at once.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
I'm playing on Pacific right now, the games are good but the software sucks. As soon as I clear this bonus I'm done [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
I actually signed up for Pacific 3 weeks ago, and haven't played on Party yet. I've had a ridiculously good run, and I'm sure part of it's the cards, but I could not believe how bad the play is.
The whole no multi-tabling thing doesn't bother me much, as I'm not a big into that, and can always bring up another site at the same time anyways. The only thing that really bothers me is there isn't SH tables for 2/4 or 3/6. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pacific Or Party, Which One Is Considered Easier
[ QUOTE ]
The only thing that really bothers me is there isn't SH tables for 2/4 or 3/6. [/ QUOTE ] Party doesn't have SH tables at these limits, either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|