|
View Poll Results: $2/$4. $600 max buy in. Which line do you prefer? | |||
2 fish 5 OKs 2 sharks + you | 3 | 5.88% | |
2 fish 2 OKs 5 sharks + you | 0 | 0% | |
5 fish 2 OKs 2 Shark + you | 13 | 25.49% | |
3 fish 3 OKs 3 sharks + you | 5 | 9.80% | |
9 sharks + you | 0 | 0% | |
9 fish + you | 30 | 58.82% | |
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
I voted for #2. Wow, I might just have to sell my pokerchips.com chips for a set of these. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
[ QUOTE ]
Somehow, I got this mental picture of TenPercenter taking delivery of 1,000 boxes of chips, dumping them in a wading pool, and wallowing around in them for a while before shipping out the individual orders. [/ QUOTE ] ya, Ten's a regular Scrooge McDuck of poker chips! |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
[ QUOTE ]
Ten; Unlike everyone else, I really like #3. It's a little busy, but I like the "iconic" look, rather than the faux-casino look. It seems like I'm in the minority here, but if you rounded the edges on the hexagon and simplified the icon a little it might have got more votes. Another potential advantage to #3 is that it is that it might be compatible with the octagons and plaques of the original Egyptians…. [/ QUOTE ] #3 is better suited for a Giant inlay along the same lines of the Vineyards and Bellagio chips. it does not look good as using the geometric inlay shapes. if it were to take up the majority of the chip, then it would look fantastic (along with a few color tweaks to match the chip colors of course) but people, you do realize that these designs will probably be nothing like the actual chip right? they are just here for reference and to get an idea of what people like. the actual logo and writing on the chip are not set in stone. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
I also voted for #2, but almost chose #1. I do think #2 is more modern and will fit better with the colors allowed.
Regarding the inlay shapes -- I was under the impression that Dice702 didn't have a choice about the size. I thought I read somewhere that the trademark chips are going to have the same inlay size mis-match. If this is the case and you are forced to make them that way, I would be tempted, but would probably pass. If you are sucessful with getting the inlay shapes varied, I don't see how I could pass up a set, probably 500 for me. Will depend on my chip budget at the time though. Currently I'm WAY over budget. Another idea if there are too many restrictions on the Paulsons might be to go with TR King. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
i hope its along the lines of these for the inlay shape 25c cirlce $1 octagon? $5 flower $25 star $100 widget $500 hexagon $1000 ? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
I'll spend a grand (or more) on Paulsons. I won't on TR King. I might think about it for ASMs or Blue Chips, but Blue Chips would be pretty dang iffy.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
Off topic now, I just got this chip on Ebay:
I like the old style design, but probably wouldn't look good on the new Paulsons. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
#2 it is... I am down for either 1000 or 2000.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
100,000 .......... [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Design review for the Pharaoh\'s Club Paulson chips
In other words, 100 of us fools with money we're willing to part with for a kilochip.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|