Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-09-2004, 02:45 AM
Tommy Angelo Tommy Angelo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 1,048
Default Re: On Lepore\'s Objection to Weideman\'s Argument

[ QUOTE ]
(or for that matter make the crying call because it -does- pay off one in twelve or whatever, that time it does pay off we look like a genius)

[/ QUOTE ]

This is over the hills and far away but I still don't get it with the calling-at-the-same-rate-that-the-guy-bluffs as being some achievement or something. How does that make money exactly? The way I see it is, If, in a particular river situation, I think my opponent will bluff one time in ten, then my goal is to call the one time I have him beat, and fold the other nine.



Tommy
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.