Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 09-07-2004, 09:49 PM
Cerril Cerril is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 933
Default Re: On Lepore\'s Objection to Weideman\'s Argument

It is in the 21C ed, invovling two people playing junk cards because one knows the other one has 'nothing' and the other knows the first has less than his 'nothing'.

We all see it when we call down someone, holding Queen high, with a scary board and take out the missed draw. (or for that matter make the crying call because it -does- pay off one in twelve or whatever, that time it does pay off we look like a genius)

Anyway, what that all comes back to is one of those fundamental rules not to force your opponent to play better when you could otherwise have him playing stupid. Don't give him odds to chase, don't bluff into the calling station... all that stuff. He's not playing smarter, but the quality (EV) of his play is substantially higher because you're playing as if he's better than he is.

Of course it may not make a -EV player +EV, but anywhere he improves against you, you lose.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.