Let Me Get This Straight

[adios]

The Kerry die hards state that:

Kerry's service in Viet Nam is better, more honorable, what have you than Bush having strings pulled to serve in the National Guard.

Kerry was right about wide spread atrocities in Viet Nam and that official military policy more or less created the atmosphere that led to these atrocities and that the military condoned such activity. Basically they seem to hold the position that Viet Nam was an unjust, morally wrong war.


My question is why is Kerry's conduct regarding Viet Nam better, more honorable, what have you than Bush's ie why do the die hard Kerry supporters feel it is better to serve and participate in a morally wrong and unjust war where atrocitiess are widespread than to avoid serving in such a war?