Questionable Ethics?

[Maddenboy]

First off, the money should have stayed in.

1) if the dealer believes that Villian can take it back, what happened when the original action passed UTG? Dealer should have said "your action Villain." Did dealer skip villain, or did he offer villian the opportunity to act? If he skipped him, doesn't that suggest that the action was valid in the dealer's (puny) mind?

2) if dealer says V can take it back, what about the action behind V. The people who folded, presumably to a raise, have been affected by his "action," (they may not have folded but/for the raise) so in most places the action stands.

3) I would never, ever take the dealer's word as final. You should have called the floorman.