Powell admits to misleading the public about Iraq-Al Qaeda

[MMMMMM]

ACPlayer, you wrote:

"You are right about one thing, the only benefit from the costs I catalogues earlier is that a criminal does not run Iraq. Other than that, your thinking is clouded by your well established bigotry."

Well here below is the post you were responding to. Find for me in it, if you can, anything which even remotely resembles bigotry.

M wrote: "On what grounds do you claim the Midle East is not safer? Libya has voluntarily come out of the closet and agreed to disarm of its WMD, and our forces are in a strategic location from whence they can drop-kick any regional terrorist enclaves should the need arise. So...how can you make such a statement...unsupported, and probably wrong to boot.

Iraqi future is indeed mostly promises and hopes at present, but at least they have a chance for a turn...unlike when ruled by that depraved Stalinist despot.

On what grounds do you claim the US is no safer? al-Qaeda has been deprived of their choice central location, terror plots have been foiled, 2/3 of al-Qaeda leadership has been captured or killed...yet you make this unsupported statement as if stating a fact. Unsupported, and probably wrong...just as Dean absurdly proposed that 1) we were no safer, and 2) that he wouldn't want to prejudge bin-Laden's guilt.

Common sense does appear to be in somewhat short supply these days."

ACPlayer, when you stop and think, do you actually spend any time thinking...or do you just go through the motions?