Limit vs. No Limit

[JeanieJ]

<font color="purple">
A few days ago I decided to give Pacific Poker a try. (they have only limit tables). I put 40 bucks into an account they gave me 10 that gives me 50(i'm sure you can add).

After the first day I had 32 left. Was a pretty bad day. The next day I turned my 32 into 200 in 12 hrs. Not too good, but not too bad for the stakes I was playing. I was amazed at how well the limit was working for me, but thought maybe it was just a lucky day. I come back yesterday and Build my stack for 200 to 615 in only 8 hrs of play.

My question is this:

Why does limit hold em' seem to be working for me a lot better than no-limit did? I played NO limit on Poker Stars,UB, and a few others but never seemed to come out overly ahead. I'm doing really well here at Pacific and I have a feeling it's because of the Limit. Should I stick to Limit hold em and make my money that way? I always thought Limit never brought in the money, but I've proven that wrong to myself.

Any Comments would be appreciated. </font>