Is it possible for a table to be too bad to play?

[miket523]

Thanks for the help everyone. Looking back on it I believe that the variance is what is making me crazy. Now I have a question that ties into a couple of your answers concerning what % of flops I should see. Keeping in mind that I am mathematically minded it seems to me that as long as a player is sufficiently tighter than the table he can make money. It appears that if one plays about 60% of the flops that the table is playing he is playing tight enough to outplay his opponents. As an example that means that at a table with 60% seeing the flop theoretically you can see about 36% of the flops and still be playing tight enough relative to the table to make money but at a table seeing 40% of the flops you would need to cut back to about 24%. Is my thinking illogical or incorrect? Has anyone else experimented with this idea and come up with a similar theory?