#1
|
|||
|
|||
Conditional Suffrage?
Disclaimer: Just recently started visiting this particular forum, so my apologies in advance if this has already been discussed.
------------ Is conditional suffrage a good idea? I'm not talking about racial or sexual discrimination here (i.e. "your grandfather's grandfather" recursive discrimination or no women voting), but rather, objective, competence-based restrictions that ensure that the unacceptable ignorance of the masses doesn't elect an unqualified individual into an important position. (Republicans & Democrats, please try to behave - GWB is not necessarily the topic of this conversation). Right now, to the best of my knowledge, the only requirements to register to vote and do so are: 1) 18 years of age or older. 2) Be a US citizen. 3) Not be a convicted felon. Should that be all? Example: Warik: "Who are you voting for in the presidential election?" Person: "There's an election this year?" Warik: "Yes. Are you registered to vote?" Person: "I don't know. Who's running?" Warik: "George W. Bush is running against John Kerry. Who are you voting for?" Person: "I don't know... who should I vote for?" Warik: "I am going to vote for __________. He is a member of the _____________ party. Don't vote for ____________. He's a member of the _____________ party and they are all assholes." Person: "Ok I will!" Is allowing "Person" to have the right to vote really in the best interests of this country... or... given the potential effects an individual can have in a particular position of power........... the world? |
|
|