Party 100NL (full ring) profitability

[mrgold]

ive been moderately into poker for a year or two but have only really gotten serious about it in the past week or so. Ive been quad tabling party 100 (full ring) and trying to play fairly ABC but not really paying a whole lot of attention to specfic players beyond whatever reads i get off pokertracker. Over my first 4.5k hands im only up a little over the rake (playing 15 VPIP and 6 PFR) and I feel like the players arent throwing money away at nearly the rate i had expected/hoped. I know this sample size isnt great (my standard deviation is still gotta be like 8bb/100) and I feel like I can defiitely step my game up some (need to lay down busted overpairs a bit more quickly and extract more w/ sets). Another thing I thought was interesting is so far I am down huge on cold calling low pp preflop (I havent taken a big set over set). I used to feel like this was a huge winner at these stakes (and it still may prove to be as my sample size goes up) but I am wondering if prehaps my current policy of calling ne raise hu up to 5bb in pos or oop w/ ne pp is overdoing it.

I was wondering if anyone familiar with these games could give info on how easy these games are too beat playing tight ABC poker. Or do you feel that the game is so saturated w/ tight set miners that a LAG style would be more effective (i think i could only play one or two tables if i tried to do this)? I really appreciate any insight yall can offer and apologize if this topic has been covered before (if so could someone point me in the right direction).