Full Tilt Age Question?

[ QUOTE ]
Full tilt games are often of poor quality, and there aren't enough players on the site. Also, I hate their software and their bonuses take way too long to clear.

However, I remember the NL games were much better than the limit games. Also, there was no shortage of poor players at the heads up freeze outs. LHE is my mainstay though, because its so much easier to multitable.

On a general note, I take issue with full tilt's marketting campaign of "learn from the pros, play like the pros" etc. They email you strategy articles for christ sake. Partypoker is about pure gambling. There's no strategy image that the site has. They have sidebets and blackjack, and they aren't afraid of that image.

Full tilt gives you strategy books with your players points. Partypoker gives you baseball caps and sandles.
Hella people get smashed out drunk and log onto partypoker on weekend nights. Those same people just aren't attracted to the idiot marketting of ultimate bet, pokerstars, and full tilt. All of those sites deserve to go broke.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why so many people on 2+2 diss the smaller sites. I realize party IS better for higher limit players (like 15/30ish), but at the 3/6 and 5/10 bracket, I really do not see the big deal about party. The support is horrible, the software sucks and the games are not that great. Sure, the big thing with party is there is ALWAYS playable games, but there rarely seems to be great ones. IMO if you have money deposited at all the sites and simply play wherever the good games are, you do way better than playing at party all the time. And let's not forget to mention party's increasingly crappy bonuses, reloads...and no "official" rakeback.

-dustyn