|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 2+2's must post profit at all levels. Do I have unfinished business at the $11 tables? | |||
| Your itm at the $5 is impressive, can you teach me? |
   
|
5 | 7.58% |
| You are stupid, Im putting you on my ignore list! |
  
|
9 | 13.64% |
| How can anyone lose at the $11? |
  
|
12 | 18.18% |
| Let it slip, it doesnt matter. |
  
|
21 | 31.82% |
| You have issues, seek psychiatric help! |
  
|
19 | 28.79% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
12-02-2005, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If either USC or Texas lose this weekend...
[ QUOTE ]
USC, on the other hand, deserves the Rose Bowl even with a loss. They haven't lost in three years, got shafted 2 years ago and deserve to go for a 3-pea [/ QUOTE ] I don't know how I feel when I hear a statement like this. The purpose of the National Championship is to match No. 1 vs. No. 2. I don't necessarily think that the previous 1 or 2 years should come into play. The ESPN culture has become obsessed with the dynasty though, so it is impossible to eliminate this factor. For those of you that say PSU was 2 seconds from going undefeated, enough! You lost the game! OSU was a dropped pass from beating Texas, but in the end its just another L in the loss column. If Texas and USC both lose this weekend, here is a list of the once beaten teams. Texas USC PSU LSU (if they beat UGA) Virginia Tech Oregon UCLA West Virginia For those of you that say USC should be a lock regardless of a W or L Saturday, how can you do that when a 1 loss UCLA team beat them? 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode