#1
|
|||
|
|||
(10+1) Raising with mediocre cards after a small all-in
***** Hand History for Game 3090277667 *****
50/100 Tourney Texas Hold'em Game Table (NL) (Tournament 17697829) - Thu Nov 24 22:20:04 EST 2005 Table Table 67567 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button Total number of players : 8 Seat 1: MLTanberg (1230) Seat 2: RolledUpTwos (860) Seat 3: JPPrewitt (610) Seat 4: notwortharag (1740) Seat 5: fogmitt (1110) Seat 6: dadams7273 (75) Seat 7: Duzno6715 (900) Seat 8: SexyJosem (1475) notwortharag posts small blind (25) fogmitt posts big blind (50) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to SexyJosem [ Ks, 9c ] dadams7273 raises (75) to 75 dadams7273 is all-In. Duzno6715 folds. SexyJosem raises (225) to 225 UTG has 75 chips left (blinds 25/50) and raises all-in (a raise of just 25). I figured that there was a good chance that they'd have rubbish, and thought K9o had a good chance of leading against the all-in player. If I raised enough to dissuade other players, I'd be getting 2-1 on my money. I thought that other players would think that anyone who re-raised after an all-in must have a good hand (and thus fold). Is this thinking right? Other players criticised me for making it less likely that this player was knocked out, but i figured that for myself, I'd get great odds on my money after blinds are included. |
|
|