What could Dannenman have put Hachem on in the last hand?

yeah, I understand. I think if you want a better picture of the final table you should listen to all 14 hours of the cardplayer.com commentary. Even Hellmuth and some others were impressed with the aggression Black and Kanter were showing. The commentary gives you a much better idea of the overall level of play, and it explains why Hachem's stand with Q8 (Q7?) made sense and also shows how terribly unlucky Black got since he was playing so well.


[ QUOTE ]
no keysar thats not what i said. but based on the tiny fraction of what i saw it wasnt even close to being called a world series. it was not good poker play based on the hands they saw fit for tv which means all the other ones were much worse if thats possible. an i have played with barch before an he is a decent player an hachem has some skill. but i would still sit down with these 9 including mike m. and feel comfortable with my skill level.[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think that this is probably the ugliest play ive seen at a final table ever. what i wouldnt of gave to play with these 9 "very nice" poker players. the only two i give any respect for(and it aint much other than the fact they all made it through a sea of players) is hachem an tex and of course mike m. the rest of these guys musta had some super great runs.

[/ QUOTE ]


So after seeing a tiny fraction of the hands at the final table, you've come to the conclusion that you're much better than Tex, Hachem, and Andy Black?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]