Limit and No-Limit

[themflags]

Interested in your thoughts . . .
I've been playing micro limit hold 'em for about a year (off-n-on). I play 10-handed, and do not play tourneys. Lately, I've played in a couple NL freerolls to pass the time, and I'm wondering if I should take a closer look at this? Where my head is at right now, I want Limit to continue to be my focus.

My question is -- is NL any more/less lucrative than Limit? Is there a danger that a Limit player will misunderstand or misapply some important NL concepts? Can NL pollute my Limit game, or can my Limit experience make learning NL harder? My perception always had been the bad players play Limit because it was simpler to grasp. Would you agree with this?

I consider myself a relatively solid Limit player at my stakes. My BB/100 right now (after some really discouraging bad streaks) is .85. It had been in excess of 2.0. It's moving in the right direction now. I've got about 12K hands, and I am maintaining a profit for all of it.

Any thoughts on this are appreciated!