Why demand logic?

[PrayingMantis]

[ QUOTE ]
No, all that required is that people belief some beliefs are mutually exclusive. Then they would beleive in the possibility (and understand the concept of) a self-defeating religon.

and now you definitely don't need an example.



[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, of course, very nice. Way to go for saying absolutely nothing, and also with too many words. Previously you have said that some certain beliefs are mutually exclusive, now you have somehow forgot the word "certain" and are saying that "all that required is that people belief some beliefs are mutually exclusive". And if people don't believe that? Well, hmmmm. It doesn't matter, since all you said is that it is "required". All that is required for me to become a little hairy spider is that my right leg will spontaneosly start dancing the cha-cha-cha. This is really great. True? False? How do you even verify it? Who knows and who cares. Let me write your next version for you. Here it goes: "it is clear that if some people believe that it is possible to believe that a belief regarding the possibility of some beliefs being mutually exculsive is possible, then surely the possibility of believing in the belief that someone can believe the possibility of self-defeating religion, is possible."

Now you don't need to write it yourself.

You are also correct about no example needed. What you are saying is crystal clear, and it has nothing to do with anything in particular, whether anything in particular exists or not, true or not, afkniouf394893h4 or not.

[ QUOTE ]
Either its possible to believe some propositions cannot be believed or its unbelievable that some propositions cannot be believed

[/ QUOTE ]

If you think that this sentence, as simple as it is, is meaningful in any sense whatsever to any kind of discussion between human beings about logic and religion, or about anything at all, you are very high on drugs. Which is OK BTW.

[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]