|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: And your favorite is | |||
| A Skit |
   
|
1 | 1.45% |
| Last Call |
  
|
1 | 1.45% |
| Family Business |
  
|
9 | 13.04% |
| Through the Wire |
  
|
4 | 5.80% |
| Two Words |
  
|
6 | 8.70% |
| School Spirit |
  
|
5 | 7.25% |
| Breathe In Breathe Out |
|
1 | 1.45% |
| Slow Jamz |
|
2 | 2.90% |
| The New Workout Plan |
|
3 | 4.35% |
| Get Em High |
|
10 | 14.49% |
| Never Let Me Down |
|
8 | 11.59% |
| Jesus Walks |
|
4 | 5.80% |
| Spaceship |
|
2 | 2.90% |
| All Falls Down |
|
9 | 13.04% |
| We Don't Care |
|
4 | 5.80% |
| Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
11-11-2005, 10:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please help me settle an argument about 20 table SNG\'s
[ QUOTE ]
the more players in em the more my edge is imho. [/ QUOTE ] These kind of arguments make no sense to me (another type of argument was that you would have a higher EV with a 25 table rather than a 20 table SnG). Let's say you are at the 90th percentile of all tournament players. In a 20 table SnG (180 players), there would typically be 18 players who are better than you. In a 25 table SnG (225 players), there would typically be 22 - 23 players better than you. In a 2000 player tournament, there would typically be 200 players better than you. A smaller tournament reduces playing time and variance, IMO, and that is all. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode