What about the Democrats makes some here support an anti-poker party?

[jj_frap]

1. I'm not American: I'm Canadian, but since you guys appointed a Bob Jones-"educated" segregationist (Back when he graduated, Bob Jones was segregated and probably more proud of that fact than any other "educational" institution in the South) who knows nothing about my country as your ambassdor to Canada, I'm going to be an obnoxious prat about everything you do. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Besides: In many cases, American and (to a somewhat lesser extent) Chinese policy affect life in Canada. (You think we'd ban cannabis if Washington and Beijing weren't blackmailing us to do so? Forget about it!)

2. If I were American, I would often vote Green, Socialist (the real ones...Not the Social Democrats USA neo-con front group), or (in spite of my misgiving about unregulated capitalism) even Libertarian before voting Democratic. (Clinton's gang were also censorship-loving bigots. Whether your a religious lunatic or a PC wacko pandering to religious lunatics so that you don't get your ass kicked even more than you already do in every election, you're still far beneath meriting my support.)

That being said, the Democrats are generally benign to friendly with regards to playing poker on the Internet, while many Republicans are pretty overt in their attempts to get it banned.

What is it about the Democrats or the third parties that's so bad that you'd prefer support a party that's working to ban your hobby and -- in many cases -- your primary or secondary source of income?