10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance

I appreciate the response Matt. The reason I created this post was to get responses like that. Some prefer to play 4 tables and they believe this is optimal because they are still able to obsereve everything and make moves on certain opponents. I like to play 10 tables because of my style of play. Currently I am most comfortable playing super tight aggressve. I see this as a way to reduce variance as small as possible. Also, the way I view poker on PP is that the majority of times you are going to get paid off is when you are either playing a complete donk, or when you have many premium hands. The way to increase both of these variables to increase the number of tables/hands played. On any given night if I only play 4 tables I might not have many premium hands but if I would have sit at 4 different tables then I would have had a huge rush. Hopefully playing that many tables will even things out.

I just aquired the skill over time. Started with NL 100 and worked my way up. I have been playing for over 3 years now and a mechanical engineer going to law school so I believe I have some apptitude. Also, never lacking confidence or competitiveness.