Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Psychology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 10-30-2005, 03:12 AM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 205
Default Game Evaluation and the Two-Strikes Stop Loss

This is my new copy/paste response to stop-loss posts. Basically an attempt to make a "quit the game formula" that is not results-oriented or otherwise based on ridiculous misconceptions about math.

I don't know how useful this is going to be to others; maybe most people aren't this self-aware, or maybe they don't make the kinds of errors I outline and count when deciding whether to quit. Regardless I hope this is at least interesting to some people.

----------

If you've been studying this game for any length of time, I assume that you've absorbed a lot of different poker concepts, sometimes conflicting. You take these concepts to the table and you make decisions continuously based on those concepts. Most likely, you sometimes make mistakes.

What the "Two-Strikes" stop-loss does is set a limit on how many mistakes you are "allowed" to make before ending a session.

By "mistakes" I am not talking about errors based on factors you don't know about. If you're an NL cash player who has never read a book or post about tournaments in your life, and you decide to try one and end up calling an all-in raise on the bubble with AQo because you correctly put the raiser on "any two cards," this isn't a mistake of the type I'm discussing. It's also not a mistake if you thought, "What should I do? I'm not sure," then chose a course of action that turned out to be wrong after some reflection. A mistake is when deep down, you know better. A mistake is when you say, "I know I shouldn't raise here but I'm going to anyway," or "D'oh! Why did I just check there?!?"

Examples of mistakes I count: Losing track of the pot size in B&M play, not acting on reads when I should, not bothering to attempt reads before making an ill-advised river bet, slamming into a check-raise on the turn for the same reason, shutting down even when I'm ahead often enough that I should be value raising, or acting on a read and having it be blatantly wrong. This list probably varies from player to player based on their strengths, weaknesses, and level of experience.

So, when should you quit? I won't presume to set a limit for anyone else because it probably depends on your concentration level, what kind of game you play, how experienced you are and how many tables you play at once. I'm calling this "Two-Strikes" because my limit is two. Two mistakes and I'm done for the day, or maybe for the next several hours if it's early in the morning and my day off and I had no other plans.

If you want to make this dependent on how good the game is (and you eventually should), mistake-count your opponents. Count the number of things they are doing that are blatantly incorrect, and presumably the higher the number the better the game is (I haven't really been doing this part consciously too much so I don't have a specific number but I know I do this on a subconscious level; I've actually been giggling at bad beats lately because of what they mean for the quality of the table). This isn't as straightforward as mistake-counting yourself because your opponents might be so much better than you (or have a playing style so radically different from yours) that what you THINK is a mistake isn't. Or maybe a decision is close and they did the opposite of what you would do. But there are still obvious things you can notice. For example, if pots are regularly more than four-handed in a limit hold-'em game, then some people are limping with trash (but not all of them; if five people limp, two might be donkeys with trash and three might be sharks with reasonable drawing hands). Sometimes people will voluntarily tell you how bad they are (After limping K7s: "I had to play it, sevens are hitting!") but be reasonably sure someone isn't BSing you for image purposes before you take comments too seriously. Once I was going to leave a B&M game because I was tired until someone called me on the river with 32 on a board of 44553 because "I thought you were bluffing!"

If someone does something masterful that you wouldn't have thought of doing yourself but looks to be a great play, you might want to assign that player a negative number.

If you don't notice your opponents making mistakes? Well, just as a "mistake" according to Two-Strikes isn't a mistake if you didn't know better, your opponents mistakes are also not mistakes if you would make the same mistake yourself. So if you can't spot mistakes, the other people at the table are probably at least as good as you are, or you need to up your powers of observation. And if you're making mistakes but they're not? QUIT. I don't care if you're up five racks and "running hot" or if you're down one rack and have one more to go before your magic number kicks in, the game is -EV and you should leave. Even wanting practice or education is not an excuse because if you're making mistakes you're not playing at the top of your game and not in the best position to learn anyway.

So, in short:

A: Count your mistakes
B: Count your opponents mistakes

If these conditions are unfavorable, end your session. Regardless of money won or lost.

Thanks for reading this far.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.