![]() |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
While many lemmings on 2+2 like to critise them, McEvoy/Cloutier have a heck of alot more WSOP bracelets than most of thier critics do. [/ QUOTE ] I really wouldn't argue that the correctness of McEvoy's writing is justified by his tournament results, because his tournament results are pathetic. I can't remember the exact numbers, because I calculated this a while ago, but McEvoy has averaged approximately 70k per year over the last 22 or so years in tournament prizes. This doesn't account for his buy-ins therefore it is entirely possible that McEvoy is actually a losing player In a discussion of who was the worst player to ever win the WSOP, Daniel Negraneau wrote, with a tone of surprise, that people didn't know how bad a player McEvoy is. In other words, McEvoy isn't even in the same league as Moneymaker, Fowler, or Varkonyi. WOW! Best regards, Snowball |
|
|