Canterbury floor ruling

[PokerBob]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Again, for Canterbury Park players, the basic thing is this:

YOU CAN ACCUSE TWO PEOPLE OF COLLUSION (MAYBE YOU JUST DON'T LIKE THEM) AND REGARDLESS OF YOUR REASONING FOR IT, THOSE TWO PEOPLE WILL NO LONGER BE ALLOWED TO PLAY AT THE SAME TABLE.

So, all you CB'ers, go wild. Can't stand that guy with BO? HE'S A COLLUDER. Can't stand the obnoxious 18 year old punk and his friend? OK, THEY'RE COLLUDING.

[/ QUOTE ]

let me be the first to say that the next time i am at a table with you and BK, i will cry collusion IMMEDIATELY.

[/ QUOTE ]

See that is the whole point: I am seriously worried that someday this very thing will happen, especially because BK and I often win and are friends, BK and I play eachother aggressively, and there are certainly a few people at CB who do not like BK because of the way he acts at the table. And apparently if it does, there's nothing I can do about it even though I'm not colluding and it's obvious I'm not.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. this whole incident/situation is alarming. it seems that the floor didn't want to disappoint a whiny loser, and chose instead to pass the buck.