![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Isn't Sammy 8.9:1 to flop a set without Curtis also flopping a set? And he'll still lose about about 9% of time on the safest flops (no backdoor draws) and 41% of the time on the scariest flops (gutshot with flush and set draws). My guess is that is a marginally minus EV call. However, about 10% of the time he should flop big enough that he knows he can go all-in as a 90% favorite, and given his big chip stack plus meta-game considerations, it's a fine gamble. I think he just has to be willing to fold a set if Curtis shows strength when an A, K, Q flops or a 3-flush flops. [/ QUOTE ] I think Sammy can make a good read on this board and get away from the hand if Curtis shows strength here. If we believe that Curtis isn't some donk who raises 20xBB with any 2 cards just to play LAGGish, then Sammy will be really careful. Remember, he just doubled up. No reason to throw it all away when you might be beat with set over set (if the A or K flops). I think Farha played this well, got lucky and stacked off someone overplaying AA. [/ QUOTE ] If sammy flops a set here, theres no way he's getting away from it, i think this was a bad call (or atleast -cEV) he doesnt hit his set enough, ,and when he does he gest drawn out on enough to make this suck. Also, sincec when is a huge raise always AA/KK... i'd say more often than not a big raise like that means AK or maybe JJ.. people think they dont want to see flops with those hands or overbet it. |
|
|