#1
|
|||
|
|||
Good player 3 bets yourJJ when you try to isolate bad players.
$3/$6 Blinds No Limit Hold'em 9 handed Seat 4 is the button Total number of players : 9 Seat 1: HERO ( $396.9 ) Seat 2: Villan ( $872.3 ) 20/12/19.00 with 129 hands Seat 8: BAD1 ( $111.1 ) 42/13/1.5 Seat 9: BAD2 ( $285 ) 44/12/.85 BAD1 and BAD2 are really terrible players... get them alone in a hand. Dealt to HERO [ Jc Jd ] PREFLOP: BAD1 raises [$18]. // Bad player raises! BAD2 calls [$18]. // Bad player calls HERO raises [$100]. // I'm thinking that I want to isolate the bad players so I can get them alone, I figure JJ is plenty to fight these bad players. Villan raises [$872.3]. // Good tight very aggressive player 21/12/22.00 (134 hands) 3 bets me... what would you do here? I've only seen the Villan show AA and QQ in the last 130 or so hands... // This is exactly what I didn't want to happen ... // a good player sticking his nose in while I take a chainsaw // to the bad player petting zoo. Now I'm thinking I should not have over bet. Probably a bet of around $40 to $50 would have been better. Or is it better to just call the $18 and avoid this kind of mess? ... or is something else better? Folded back to me. I think this is an example of how *not* to isolate bad players... Should I have bet about $55 or so to try to isolate or should I not bother with trying to isolate by overbetting? comments? |
|
|