My take on the 'dump the skins fiasco'

[sexdrugsmoney]

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr />
Party in one week may go from the largest poker site on the internet to the fourth or fifth. This could pave the way for other large sites to really increase market share. The impact on many pro's that are rakeback dependent multi-tablers could be devestating.

Thank you,

Jim Kuhn
Catfish4u
[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

The sharks will go where the fish are, and the fish will go where the advertisements lead them, and Party outmarkets any other site.

While you may be right, and many 'breakeven' players who live of rakeback may go to the competitors, they may just get better at Poker. Party's allowing 10 tables now proves that they expect many of the mutli-tablers to migrate across to Party, because that's where the fishies are.

I think this is a smart move by Party who knew they had a base which was worth more exclusive than shared, but who knows, it could backfire on them? (I personally doubt it though)

Question is, will Empire go bust? Unlike Eurobet which has a sportsbook and casino, I imagine the 'exclusive' Party skins (should that be former Party skins?) will have to talk to their accountants.