400 nl versus 600 nl IGM sites
(this is 6max)
ok, I did try searching for something like this, I promise
wondering if you think there is more money to be won at 400 nl. I've been bouncing between 600 and 400 a lot recently.
My only reason for thinking that 400 may be more profitable is that there are always new tables to move to, making good table selection MUCH easier. Personally, over the last 7k hands at 600 nl I'm winning about 2.4ptbb/100 (not big enough sample size I'm aware). over the last 20k hands at 400 nl I've been making 10.4ptBB/100.
So I guess what I'm asking is, has anybody with larger sample sizes noticed that the possible PTBB/100 at 400 is high enough to make it a smarter choice than 600?
|