($27) - Early JJ POST-flop...big pot, multiway

[bluefeet]

[cont.]

Very early, no notes
$25+2 Turbo
Seat 1: (1820 in chips)
Seat 2: (1510 in chips)
Seat 3: (1390 in chips)
Seat 4: (1460 in chips)
Seat 5: (1540 in chips)
Seat 6: (1060 in chips)
<font color="blue">bluefeet (1480 in chips) </font>
Seat 8: (2000 in chips)
Seat 9: (1240 in chips)
bluefeet: posts small blind 15
Seat 8: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bluefeet [Jh Jd]
1 fold
Seat 1: calls 30
Seat 2: raises 90 to 120
Seat 3: calls 120
3 folds
bluefeet: calls 105
1 fold
Seat 1: calls 90
*** FLOP *** [6h Kc 7d] .............pot=510
<font color="blue">bluefeet: checks </font>
Seat 1: checks
Seat 2: bets 120
Seat 3: folds
<font color="blue">bluefeet: raises 150 to 270</font>
Seat 1: folds
Seat 2: calls 150
*** TURN *** [6h Kc 7d] [Tc] .............pot=1050
<font color="blue">bluefeet: ??? </font>


Ok. I don't disagree. I could/should have just as easily folded. But...

[FPS discussion following....all be it a little interesting I think]

He "only" bet about 1/4 the pot. With this size of a pot, the BB and the EP limp/caller having checked, still 3 other hands at the table, his c/b was a little fishy to me. It's almost too inviting. Either way scared/"damn, i have to bet something don't i?", or a monster like KK. I think even AA/AK would be value betting at least 1/2 here - having a PF cold-caller behind still to act. It just too small of a bet IMO, giving 6:1 (or better) back to the blind/EP.

When MP1 folded, the only other guy in the pot with me was UTG. Having limp/called PF, I didn't give him too much consideration. So...c/r seemed like an option.

This is where I got stuck a bit. IMO I should have raised a little more...with full intention of laying it down to a reraise, but enough to get him to laydown QQ, TT, etc. But then again, too strong might be a little fishy too. If I was confident in my hand, facing a likely HU to the turn, might I not encourage a call?

Well, as you can see, he did call. Hmmmm....