AA

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

You can keep constructing your custom examples where if you limp you get 341 callers so that's much better then if you raise because then you only get 2 other callers. Plus when you limp by god one of those 341 other players will raise then you get to three bet and my just think of the money!!!!! But you proved our point with:

[ QUOTE ]
Firstly, as an example, lets assume your raise limits the field to 3 opponents and a call allows 6 opponents.
AA equity 3opponents = 63.9%*3 -1 = .917 x 2 bets = 1.8
AA equity 6 opponents = 43.6%*6 -1 = 1.616 x 1 bet = 1.6

[/ QUOTE ]

T

[/ QUOTE ]Thankyou. And you're right. I probably can put together examples to justify my reasoning and anyone elses. I think the only way to do this is to do the math. I'm going to have to ask around for some figures but I have a feeling that both strategies may prove to be profitable depending on the make up of the table eg. 3 LPP, 1 LAG, 2 TAG and depending on what position they are in.

I'm new to the game and this is how I learn.
All responses are appreciated.
I accept nothing at face value.