\"The Theory of Poker\" observation/question
I just finished reading "The Theory of Poker" and as advertised it's a great book. I wonder if any thought has been given to a revision which would include more Hold'em examples. I realize the book was written(in 1987?) prior to the explosion in popularity of Hold'em, but I was a little disappointed that the majority of examples are Stud hands. In fact I think there were more Razz and Lowball examples than Hold'em. Plus I imagine a revised TOP would be a good maketing move. I realize we Hold'em players have HPFAP, but Stud players also have SCSFAP.
|