2+2ers suck

[damaniac]

[ QUOTE ]
i just wanted to note that "good at poker" is not synonymous with "poster on 2+2" or whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have people been saying it is? (legit question, not being smart)

Also, do you mean that 2+2ers aren't all that, or that, as I gleaned from your initial post, that other styles are also very profitable, ie that LAG who played you with 63o, and we TAGs need to not be so arrogant in our assumptions that ours is the only way (assuming 2+2 TAGness can be defined as "one way")?