![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been doing some figuring on the EV numbers over at the pokerroom website, and have found, according to their EV stats, the maximum winrate.
Here's how I got it: I figured that if each hand had an EV, then it should follow that multiplying that EV amount in BB by the probability of getting that hand will provide an EV/100 hands. Proabilites: Pocket pairs: .4525 Suited: .1508 Offsuit Non-Pair: .6033 For instance, KQs is listed with an EV of 0.39. You'll get this hand .15% of the time. .39 * .15 = .0588. That's how much this hand is worth towards the theoretical "maximum" winrate. This magical theoretical figure, by-the-way is about 4.87 BB/100. My questions are: - How reliable are the numbers at pokerroom? - Even if the stats are only close to a "true" EV for each hand, the total theoretical winrate can't be much different can it? - Did I even do this right? - These stats at pokerroom do include the blinds, correct? - Assuming these number do not include the blinds and they are theoretically correct, doesn't that make this game unbeatable? I personally believe that if this is the case, then limit HE is unbeatable. Thankfully, I'm fairly certain that pokerroom's EV calculations have included the blinds. - Since I didn't do each of these hands by position (just overall), will this winrate change signifigantly when I only include hands when they are profitable at a certain position? - I noticed that some offsuit hands that have less EV are worth more to the overall BB/100 than suited hands, due to frequency. Just an interesting observation. - Adding the frequency of hands that are either +EV or null EV, it comes to a mere 13.25%. Does this mean that players who have a higher VPIP than this (outside the blinds) are either "tricky", playing hands for their relative and/or positional value? Answer any or all. Please discuss. |
|
|