Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-21-2005, 01:06 AM
Boolean Boolean is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
Default Short handed vs full table

Is variance higher when you're playing short-handed poker? Also, can you average a higher BB/100 when you're playing short-handed than at a full table? I've seen a lot of posters swear by 6max. What are the pros and cons on such a switch?

I'm working my way up the limits, starting at .05/.1 and I've found I like playing short-handed a lot better than at a full table. The pace is quicker, and I can get more accurate reads as well since most are playing more pots. I'd like to know because I want to know what sort of bankroll I should be looking at to play the 6max tables at the higher limits.

Thanks,
-Boolean
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.