Cheaters in our Midst?

[VivaLaViking]

Presented here is data from a Poker site that declares themselves as the largest. The data is of two conditions, A and B, of a greatly different number of hands played, A << B.
<ul type="square">
Condition A

N Hands 2535
N Pairs 153

Mean Theoretical Pairs 11.4
Mean Observed Pairs 11.7 +2.60%

Mean Theoretical Sets Flopped 1.23
Mean Observed Sets Flopped 1.30 +5.79%

Pair Count Win% Sets Flopped Sets Expected
A 16 87.5 1 1.72
K 11 63.6 2 1.18
Q 5 80.0 1 0.53
J 6 50.0 0 0.64
T 11 54.5 1 1.18
9 12 50.0 1 1.29
8 11 27.2 0 1.18
7 13 53.8 2 1.40
6 9 33.3 2 0.97
5 11 18.1 1 1.18
4 14 14.2 3 1.50
3 15 26.6 2 1.61
2 19 21.0 1 2.04

Condition B

N Hands 18044
N Pairs 1040

Mean Theoretical Pairs 81.6
Mean Observed Pairs 80.0 -2.01%

Mean Theoretical Sets Flopped 8.79
Mean Observed Sets Flopped 6.84 -22.1%

Pair Count Win% Sets Flopped Sets Expected
A 84 86.9 6 9.05
K 82 75.6 7 8.83
Q 79 63.2 4 8.51
J 83 62.6 6 8.94
T 82 47.5 8 8.83
9 73 39.7 5 7.86
8 86 38.3 6 9.26
7 87 25.2 7 9.37
6 77 31.1 8 8.29
5 70 15.7 5 7.54
4 73 17.8 7 7.86
3 85 15.2 9 9.15
2 79 11.3 11 8.51[/list]You are invited to comment on this please but I know a site that I will not be playing on this weekend. This evidence is conclusive to me. I appologize but names must be withheld as I am talking with a US Senator about legislation to allow jurisdiction in the US Federal Courts.


I will gladly share the software that I used to generate these conditions but you will need to preserve your hand hitoriy files.

TY