![]() |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It looked like an honest mistake to me. I've made the same mistake (and much worse mistakes) plenty of times. I think a lot of people are looking too hard for any evidence of soft play or whatever and seeing things that aren't really there. [/ QUOTE ] When you see that and you consider that one player owned a large portion of the other (or did each own a piece of the other?), it looks exponentially more suspicious. Did you know there was a business agreement between the two? If so, how can you possibly say that it isn't a suspicious sequence? |
|
|