Recent Supreme Court Ruling

[natedogg]

[ QUOTE ]
Therefore, the state is still involved, only now, with a lesser role, it is involved in such a way as to lead to more possible abuse, generally by powerful private interests over weaker ones. Yet another example of less state involvement leading to more abuses and, really, a worse functioning market economy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your incredibly tortured logic seems to ignore the fact that this abuse is occuring in the first place *because of state involvement*, namely the application of the state's monopoly of force through eminent domain laws.

And secondly, you imply that somehow this case is the result of a reduced scope of government. I'm not sure what country you live in but in the USA, no sane informed person could possibly think any signficant reduction of govt scope has occurred in living memory.

natedogg