![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I made a mistake in thinking.
Here’s the long and short of the hand. Pacific $2/$4 game – generally uber loose. On the flop and beyond it can become very LAG. People will “value” bet I guess with all sorts of strange holdings – capping with only top pair in multiway pots, on very very coordinated boards. Anyway – I post my blind in the CO and happily get dealt KJo. Could be worse. There is only one limper, so I decide to raise. (Reasonable hand, want the supreme position, want one or both blinds out) Well like a great plan – Button comes along, SB folds, BB calls – as does the limper. Flop comes a happy Kx Jx 6x rainbow/suits non factor. BB checks, Limper Bets, I call, Button calls, BB calls. (Maybe I just should have raised here, but I wanted to get the button and BB to contribute more.) I’m planning on popping the turn. This is really a rookie mistake and the more I look at it, the more foolish I feel about not raising. Turn comes a Tx BB comes out firing, limper calls, I raise --- Now. Here is where my thinking goes sideways. Obviously BB could have AQ and hit his equivalent of a gut shot. I also thought he could just have easily turned a smaller two pair. – KT- JT. I convince myself that there are more ways for our opponent to have KT and JT – than AQ - so I popped it However when I look back I see KT – 6 Ways JT – 6 Ways AQ – 16 ways. SO if I narrow hands down as such – if I would have know AQ had more possibilities than both KT and JT – I shouldn’t have raised. Keep in mind I haven’t even accounted for the possibility that he has a set. Does this seem like really weak tight thinking ? What am I missing here? Do you all have these automemorized? Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] |
|
|