|
View Poll Results: 3 betting hands | |||
TT | 95 | 40.95% | |
99 | 46 | 19.83% | |
88 | 20 | 8.62% | |
77 | 8 | 3.45% | |
66 | 3 | 1.29% | |
55 | 2 | 0.86% | |
AJs | 19 | 8.19% | |
AJo | 3 | 1.29% | |
ATs | 4 | 1.72% | |
A9s | 2 | 0.86% | |
A8s | 1 | 0.43% | |
KQs | 16 | 6.90% | |
KQo | 4 | 1.72% | |
KJs | 3 | 1.29% | |
KJo | 1 | 0.43% | |
KTs | 1 | 0.43% | |
QJs | 1 | 0.43% | |
QJo | 0 | 0% | |
JTs | 2 | 0.86% | |
J9s | 1 | 0.43% | |
Voters: 232. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rock Paper Scissors, Round 2
I wonder if it's possible to write a string of, say, 100 rolls that will have a significant edge over a randomly selected novice in a match.
|
|
|