Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20  
Old 05-24-2005, 09:08 PM
UprightCreature UprightCreature is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 19
Default Re: New And Improved Wallet Game

[ QUOTE ]
jazza's own words were "distribution function" not "density function." Did he mean it? I don't know.

[/ QUOTE ]

True I read it too fast and read what I wanted to. I assume he meant a probability density because with x = 1/sqrt(k) his average value would be $2 and he would lose anyone who chose a constant value > $2.


[ QUOTE ]
It's an interesting curiosity that the simulation is probably going to return incorrect results

[/ QUOTE ]

These kind of problems tend to be very bad for monte carlo simulations. So much of his ev is from values of k that are extremeley small, in fact an infinite amount, that you literally miss all his EV when you try to simulate it. If you somehow did have a perfect non discrete RNG you would still need to run a number of trials >> than the large constant your oponent chose. With the numbers being discussed that would take a really long time. Closed form pen and paper solutions are better here.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.