Gutsy or stupid? 55 overpair and OESD

[shejk]

What do you like my line here? This is the very first hand of the sng, and I haven't encountered villain before.

I've made some comments in the hh as to my thoughts. Spot anything wrong?

NL Hold'em $100 Buy-in + $9 Entry Fee Level:1 Blinds(10/15)
Table Table 35041 (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: henniemeijer ( $1000 )
Seat 2: Pelopidas ( $1000 )
Seat 3: rbrox ( $1000 )
Seat 4: Skooma ( $1000 )
Seat 5: Tao_Jones ( $1000 )
Seat 6: rmistereee ( $1000 )
Seat 8: pokerking883 ( $1000 )
Seat 9: henkk234 ( $1000 )
Seat 10: KROLPIKOWY ( $1000 )
Seat 7: yggse408 ( $1000 )
Trny:12269257 Level:1
Blinds(10/15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to yggse408 [ 5d 5s ]
rmistereee folds.
yggse408 calls [15].
pokerking883 calls [15].
henkk234 folds.
KROLPIKOWY folds.
henniemeijer folds.
Pelopidas folds.
rbrox folds.
Skooma calls [5].
Tao_Jones raises [45]. << great, he's giving me implied! A bit fishy, he might want to raise more normally since he's out of position, but then I haven't played him before.
yggse408 calls [45].
pokerking883 calls [45].
Skooma calls [45].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 2h, 4s, 3h ]
Skooma checks.
Tao_Jones bets [225]. <<A pretty big bet. Really smells Ace with a king or queen imo.
yggse408 calls [225]. << if I'm correct he only has 3outs, but 7 cards will scare me. Not that bad, I'll call and see what happens.
pokerking883 folds.
Skooma folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 3d ] << gives me two more outs.
Tao_Jones checks. << great, he doesn't have anything
yggse408 bets [350]. << kind of weakish bet
Tao_Jones is all-In [715] << he's representing an overpair, but it just doesn't make sense, there's something fishy here
yggse408 is all-In [365] << unfoldable with ten outs and a weird betting pattern from villain
** Dealing River ** [ 8c ]
yggse408 shows [ 5d, 5s ] two pairs, fives and threes.


Now, how do you rate me? Is this distinctly +ev, breakeven or distinctly -ev?